Chapter 18. Falsifiable Predictions. 

The different models presented in this report pose severe restrictions on nature, and are as such falsifiable predictions by their well defined properties. In chapter 16 a very specific prediction for galaxies is made. Let us look at a few more models which are postulated by our theory:

Firstly, nobody seems to believe that it is possible to describe a dense flux of a fundamental particle (here; the K flux) through which elementary particles can move without loosing their momentum. Our claim is that it is possible through the mechanisms described. For all other ether-like constructions, this has been a falsifying criterion. For our model it is quite to the contrary, it shows why and how the model’s working mechanism contributes to the law of conservation of momentum, how it incorporates general and special relativity, bending of light, red shift etc. This should be the Achilles heel of the theory, and I would advice critics to address this issue first.

Fig. 2 shows an electron in a K flux  

Secondly, the theory has a very specific model for electromagnetism, and a very strange property regarding the K emission angles from fermions, and hence the angle of the force. At small velocities, the K emission angle starts at 90 degrees relative to the fermion’s line of motion, and goes upwards as the velocity increases. However, as the velocity approaches the speed of light, the emission angle returns towards 90 degrees again. This sub-model may be wrong without falsifying the whole theory, but then another sub-model needs to be found which can explain electromagnetism as a force by proxy. Inability to falsify such a strange postulate would strongly support the whole theory.

Fig. 14. Electrostatic force arise when an electron turns the sign of some Ks, and thereby creates a K flux with a surplus of K^- and a deficiency of K⁺ amplitudes

Fig. 16. Electromagnetic force must follow the described emission patterns which make it possible for fermions in general to move in a K flux, and the emission pattern must also be compatible with how fermions must emit Ks in order to comply with special relativity.

Thirdly, the theory has a very specific model for the strong force, denying any direct attractive forces in nature. This model opens up for several types of K absorption centres, but is still very specific and therefore it should be easily falsifiable. The whole theory does not necessarily stand or fall with this sub-model.

Fig. 18 shows 2 absorption centres (could be quarks or smaller units) inside a nucleon, where the strong force is created when the absorption centres emit Ks directionally, thereby creating a huge K vacuum between the absorption centres.

Fourthly, the theory unifies all known forces in a concept of forces by proxy, based on the definition of the K particle. Gravity is explained with the same basic working mechanism as all other forces. The link between the electric force and gravity is not essential, but it is very fundamental for the further postulates about galaxies and the universe. Since the concept of the K particle started with a search for a particle which could explain gravity, I would consider it a heavy blow against the existence of the K particle if gravity cannot be explained through forces by proxy and the K particle.

Fig 4. Model of gravity, where matter converts a minute part of the background K flux to K neutrinos.

Fifthly, our sub-model for the formation of galaxies from some “invented” plasma bodies of repulsive matter is so radical that it should be an easy kill by virtue of breaking several paradigms in physics.

Fig. 22. A repulsive plasma body has an eruption of matter, which at first is repulsive plasma which is accelerated outwards. The erupted matter will convert to regular, gravitational matter over time, and gravity in the galaxy will increase. Figure 24 shows a cut through a mature, flat spiral galaxy with a repulsive plasma body at the centre of the galaxy.

Sixthly, our models do not allow black holes at the centre of galaxies. Outrageous as it is, it should also be an easy kill as well.

 

Figure 24 shows a cut through a mature, flat spiral galaxy with a repulsive plasma body at the centre of the galaxy.

And there are a lot more statements which break with today’s basic assumptions in physics. So if you cannot kill this theory in a few hours, it should really make you wonder how well substantiated today’s paradigms in physics are.

Do you have any comments? Click HERE

You are currently on page: Falsifiable Predictions

Previous page: Phenomena in Physics  Next page: Critical Comments